Close Menu
Rate My ArtRate My Art
  • Home
  • Art Investment
  • Art Investors
  • Art Rate
  • Artist
  • Fine Art
  • Invest in Art
What's Hot

TV tonight: a relaxing art competition in the Lake District | Television

January 14, 2026

Comment | In the run up to the US election, Boston’s Museum of Fine Art is hopeful about art’s role in a democratic future – The Art Newspaper

January 14, 2026

Drake Honored as Artist of the Decade at Billboard Music Awards 2021: Watch

January 14, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Get In Touch
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
Rate My ArtRate My Art
  • Home
  • Art Investment
  • Art Investors
  • Art Rate
  • Artist
  • Fine Art
  • Invest in Art
Rate My ArtRate My Art
Home»Art Investment»Trump’s art of the deal still doesn’t apply to Putin
Art Investment

Trump’s art of the deal still doesn’t apply to Putin

By MilyeMay 1, 20254 Mins Read
Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


Donald Trump, the self-proclaimed master of the art of the deal, has finally succeeded in getting one part of his grand war-ending bargain with Ukraine over the finishing line. The minerals deal the US signed with Kyiv on Thursday may not be quite as one-sided and crassly exploitative as earlier drafts suggested. Nonetheless, the deal bears all the hallmarks of the Trump administration’s approach to ending the conflict.

Washington has secured, once again, a public display of submission by the Ukrainians. Lest anyone think that the US is a chump which randomly hands out cash to democratic nations fighting for their freedom and independence, Trump has locked in a mechanism for its investment in Ukraine’s war effort to be paid back in full. But most importantly, like everything else in the world of Trumpian diplomacy the minerals deal makes grand claims but actually means little.

To be clear, it was Kyiv itself who started the ball rolling on the idea of a grand joint minerals-extraction deal in the run-up to last year’s US presidential election. Ukrainian whizz-kids drew up an investor-style pitch deck detailing the great value of the natural resources lying under their country’s soil, ready to be exploited. The idea was to appeal to transactionally-minded Republicans that continuing support for Kyiv would be to America’s Washington’s profit as well as its strategic interest. The bait worked all too well, with many senior members of the Trump team soon parroting fantastical figures.

The problem is that in the real world, the value of mineral reserves isn’t calculated by multiplying the estimated tons lying under the ground by the market price. By that measure, Ukraine is sitting on untold trillions. But to get to actual cash value, you have to look at the volume of the global market for any given metal or mineral and work out how much of that market demand you can fulfil. For example, in 2024 the world bought some $29 billion of lithium (used in car batteries) and $39 billion of titanium (used in engineering).

Ukraine may control some 5 per cent of the world’s lithium but as yet extracts none of it, and around 7 per cent of the titanium, but again produces no refined titanium and exports only much less valuable ore. Ukraine’s only graphite mine, opened in 1934, closed last December after a collapse in world prices. There’s also uranium ore, but again the real value is in semi-refined yellow cake that is used to create nuclear fuel and as yet Ukraine produces none. As for the famous “rare earth metals” – a list of fifteen elements used in electronics – Ukraine officially has none, at least according to the US Geological Survey.

Then there’s the problem of distribution of these minerals. Geology is no respecter of borders, and many of the largest deposits – for instance of Lithium ore – run from Kyiv-controlled into Moscow-controlled territory. This is especially true of the biggest and most valuable prize of all, a vast and unexploited natural gas field that runs across the Northern end of the basin of the Donets River, now mostly under Russian occupation.

In theory, then, Ukraine does have plenty of mineral resources which will one day generate plenty of wealth – just not immediately, in the words of an old Soviet joke, and not for everybody. The Americans and Ukrainians seem to have opposite visions of exactly who stands to gain.

For many US Republicans, Trump has opened up a new Klondike which will enrich American businesses. For the Ukrainians, the deal will help attract the multiple billions of dollars in investment that will be needed to extract, refine and transport the minerals from mine to market. And ironically, it’s the Ukrainians who are right – they’ve sold Trump a fantasy that his own side will have to pay to make real.

But Kyiv also hopes that now that the deal is signed the Trump White House will now become more sympathetic to their interests. Good luck with that. Earlier this week the Kremlin – in the person of the granite-faced Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov – grimly re-stated that Russia’s demands remained completely unchanged after three months of intensive Trump diplomacy.

Trump, from his position of strength, can force his weaker Ukrainian allies to swallow their pride and dance to whichever tune he wishes. Putin, however, remains deaf to Trump’s dealmaking, however artful.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
Previous ArticleShivaji K. Panikkar-chaired Commission recommends overhaul of Kerala’s fine arts education
Next Article Soli Corbelle Art Expands Advisory Services For Art Investment And Collection Management

Related Posts

Art Investment

Public Art: A Good Investment or a Waste of Taxpayers’ Money?

December 24, 2025
Art Investment

Seeing gold in decaying leases: Yield, unlocked potential draw property investors to likes of Hotel Miramar

December 19, 2025
Art Investment

Master the art of investing for fun: How to pick up a Picasso or get into the movies – without the risk of losing your shirt

December 17, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

TV tonight: a relaxing art competition in the Lake District | Television

January 14, 2026

How can I avoid art investment scams?

August 26, 2024

Art Investment Strategies: How to Capitalize on the Buyer’s Art Market

August 26, 2024
Monthly Featured
Art Investment

Over 40 new pieces of street art coming to Co Antrim towns

MilyeAugust 14, 2025
Artist

G-Dragon wins Artist Of The Year at MAMA Awards

MilyeNovember 30, 2025
Fine Art

How a furniture designer added fine art to his portfolio

MilyeNovember 11, 2025
Most Popular

Xcel Energy backs off plans for another gas rate hike in Colorado

October 21, 2024

WWE Hall Of Famer Praises Roman Reigns As “A True Artist”; Compares Success To Seth Rollins’ Rise

October 16, 2024

Write a funny caption for artist Banksy’s new animal-themed collection

August 26, 2024
Our Picks

Black HIV-positive MSM in US still have lower rates of ART use

November 18, 2025

Intoxicated passengers could be at risk on the Tube unless safety is improved, says coroner after artist high on alcohol, cocaine and ketamine was killed on track

April 25, 2025

G-PISD invests $20 million in fine arts facilities

June 12, 2025
Weekly Featured

Despite budget cuts, Fort Worth ISD fine arts ‘untapped resource’ for boosting academic achievement

October 30, 2024

Artist, ACLU sue Vail after appointment is pulled for Gaza statement

October 15, 2024

Think Fine Art is Only for the Ultra-Rich? Think Again.

February 21, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
  • Get In Touch
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2026 Rate My Art

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.